Independent research. A clearer hosting perspective.
HostingConsensus Index

THE RESEARCH LIBRARY

VPS, Cloud & Dedicated Server Hosting research

Compare vps, cloud & dedicated server hosting through independent AI consensus studies. Start with your hosting situation, then explore the providers and evidence.

15published studiesUnderstand the methodology

THE CATEGORY VIEW

Which providers show up most consistently?

A broader look across the published vps, cloud & dedicated server hosting studies. Compare recommendation prominence, then find the research for your situation.

Explore individual studies
Studies included
15
Usable AI responses
101
Platforms represented
7
Entities qualifying
38
VPS, Cloud & Dedicated Server Hosting: leading category rankings. Scores measure AI recommendation prominence across published studies.
RankProvider / published entityConsensus scoreStudy coverageAI mentions
01OVHcloud
22.2 / 100
8 / 15 studies29 / 10128.7% of usable responses
02Amazon Web Services
21.2 / 100
6 / 15 studies26 / 10125.7% of usable responses
03DigitalOcean
19.9 / 100
9 / 15 studies30 / 10129.7% of usable responses
04Vultr
17.8 / 100
8 / 15 studies30 / 10129.7% of usable responses
05Liquid Web
16.3 / 100
5 / 15 studies21 / 10120.8% of usable responses
06InterServer
10.9 / 100
6 / 15 studies18 / 10117.8% of usable responses
07Microsoft Azure
10.3 / 100
5 / 15 studies15 / 10114.8% of usable responses
08Google Cloud
10.3 / 100
4 / 15 studies16 / 10115.8% of usable responses
09Google Cloud Platform
9.1 / 100
2 / 15 studies10 / 1019.9% of usable responses
10Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
7.1 / 100
4 / 15 studies11 / 10110.9% of usable responses
See all 38 qualifying entities
VPS, Cloud & Dedicated Server Hosting: remaining category rankings. Scores measure AI recommendation prominence across published studies.
RankProvider / published entityConsensus scoreStudy coverageAI mentions
11KnownHost
6.8 / 100
3 / 15 studies11 / 10110.9% of usable responses
12Atlantic.Net
6.8 / 100
2 / 15 studies8 / 1017.9% of usable responses
13Kamatera
6.4 / 100
3 / 15 studies9 / 1018.9% of usable responses
14Hivelocity
6.2 / 100
6 / 15 studies10 / 1019.9% of usable responses
15Hetzner
5.7 / 100
2 / 15 studies9 / 1018.9% of usable responses
16Contabo
5.6 / 100
3 / 15 studies10 / 1019.9% of usable responses
17Akamai Cloud
5.4 / 100
3 / 15 studies7 / 1016.9% of usable responses
18Hostwinds
5.2 / 100
4 / 15 studies9 / 1018.9% of usable responses
19PhoenixNAP
5.0 / 100
3 / 15 studies8 / 1017.9% of usable responses
20IBM Cloud
4.2 / 100
6 / 15 studies9 / 1018.9% of usable responses
21Rackspace Technology
4.0 / 100
2 / 15 studies7 / 1016.9% of usable responses
22InMotion Hosting
4.0 / 100
3 / 15 studies6 / 1015.9% of usable responses
23Hostinger
3.9 / 100
4 / 15 studies8 / 1017.9% of usable responses
24Psychz Networks
3.8 / 100
2 / 15 studies5 / 1015.0% of usable responses
25Hetzner Cloud
3.7 / 100
3 / 15 studies6 / 1015.9% of usable responses
26CoreNetHub
3.5 / 100
3 / 15 studies5 / 1015.0% of usable responses
27NovoServe
3.0 / 100
2 / 15 studies5 / 1015.0% of usable responses
28DreamHost
2.8 / 100
2 / 15 studies6 / 1015.9% of usable responses
29Linode
2.6 / 100
3 / 15 studies6 / 1015.9% of usable responses
30ReliableSite
2.5 / 100
2 / 15 studies3 / 1013.0% of usable responses
31GigeNET
2.4 / 100
2 / 15 studies3 / 1013.0% of usable responses
32USAVPS
2.2 / 100
2 / 15 studies3 / 1013.0% of usable responses
33Civo
2.1 / 100
3 / 15 studies6 / 1015.9% of usable responses
34RackNerd
1.7 / 100
2 / 15 studies3 / 1013.0% of usable responses
35Railway
1.6 / 100
2 / 15 studies4 / 1014.0% of usable responses
36OMC Cloud
1.4 / 100
3 / 15 studies3 / 1013.0% of usable responses
37Linode (Akamai)
1.1 / 100
2 / 15 studies3 / 1013.0% of usable responses
38Equinix Metal
1.0 / 100
3 / 15 studies3 / 1013.0% of usable responses

How to read this. A first-place recommendation earns 10 points, second place 9, down to 1 point for tenth. An absence earns zero. We average within each platform, then across platforms and studies, and scale to 100. Each study has equal weight.

Only valid ranking responses count. Qualification requires at least two studies and three response appearances. Published names are grouped by case and punctuation; distinct name variants remain separate. A broad score can favor providers serving many hosting needs. It is not a customer rating, service guarantee, or assessment of workload compatibility.

Research dates: 2026-10-03. Read the ranking methodology →

Find a study for your hosting needs

Showing 1–15 of 15 results

Independent research · Open methodology