Independent research. A clearer hosting perspective.
HostingConsensus Index

THE RESEARCH LIBRARY

Ecommerce Hosting & Platforms research

Compare ecommerce hosting & platforms through independent AI consensus studies. Start with your hosting situation, then explore the providers and evidence.

15published studiesUnderstand the methodology

THE CATEGORY VIEW

Which providers show up most consistently?

A broader look across the published ecommerce hosting & platforms studies. Compare recommendation prominence, then find the research for your situation.

Explore individual studies
Studies included
15
Usable AI responses
100
Platforms represented
7
Entities qualifying
32
Ecommerce Hosting & Platforms: leading category rankings. Scores measure AI recommendation prominence across published studies.
RankProvider / published entityConsensus scoreStudy coverageAI mentions
01BigCommerce
41.8 / 100
11 / 15 studies55 / 10055.0% of usable responses
02Shopify
38.0 / 100
9 / 15 studies42 / 10042.0% of usable responses
03WooCommerce
27.4 / 100
10 / 15 studies41 / 10041.0% of usable responses
04Adobe Commerce
17.0 / 100
8 / 15 studies26 / 10026.0% of usable responses
05Wix
13.7 / 100
6 / 15 studies20 / 10020.0% of usable responses
06Medusa
11.6 / 100
4 / 15 studies16 / 10016.0% of usable responses
07Squarespace
10.0 / 100
7 / 15 studies17 / 10017.0% of usable responses
08Square Online
9.8 / 100
3 / 15 studies13 / 10013.0% of usable responses
09commercetools
9.3 / 100
3 / 15 studies14 / 10014.0% of usable responses
10Ecwid
8.7 / 100
4 / 15 studies15 / 10015.0% of usable responses
See all 32 qualifying entities
Ecommerce Hosting & Platforms: remaining category rankings. Scores measure AI recommendation prominence across published studies.
RankProvider / published entityConsensus scoreStudy coverageAI mentions
11Saleor
7.9 / 100
2 / 15 studies11 / 10011.0% of usable responses
12Vendure
7.4 / 100
2 / 15 studies10 / 10010.0% of usable responses
13Payhip
6.5 / 100
2 / 15 studies9 / 1009.0% of usable responses
14Shift4Shop
6.4 / 100
4 / 15 studies11 / 10011.0% of usable responses
15Spree Commerce
5.2 / 100
3 / 15 studies7 / 1007.0% of usable responses
16OroCommerce
5.1 / 100
3 / 15 studies7 / 1007.0% of usable responses
17Big Cartel
5.0 / 100
2 / 15 studies8 / 1008.0% of usable responses
18SAP Commerce Cloud
4.9 / 100
3 / 15 studies7 / 1007.0% of usable responses
19Shopify Plus
4.9 / 100
3 / 15 studies8 / 1008.0% of usable responses
20Salesforce B2B Commerce
4.8 / 100
2 / 15 studies7 / 1007.0% of usable responses
21Gumroad
4.6 / 100
2 / 15 studies9 / 1009.0% of usable responses
22Shopware
4.3 / 100
4 / 15 studies8 / 1008.0% of usable responses
23Bagisto
3.0 / 100
2 / 15 studies6 / 1006.0% of usable responses
24VTEX
2.7 / 100
3 / 15 studies5 / 1005.0% of usable responses
25Sellfy
2.3 / 100
3 / 15 studies5 / 1005.0% of usable responses
26PrestaShop
2.3 / 100
4 / 15 studies9 / 1009.0% of usable responses
27FastSpring
2.3 / 100
2 / 15 studies3 / 1003.0% of usable responses
28Centra
2.1 / 100
2 / 15 studies3 / 1003.0% of usable responses
29Your Next Store
2.1 / 100
2 / 15 studies3 / 1003.0% of usable responses
30Elastic Path
1.9 / 100
2 / 15 studies5 / 1005.0% of usable responses
31OpenCart
1.1 / 100
4 / 15 studies6 / 1006.0% of usable responses
32Salesforce Commerce Cloud
0.7 / 100
3 / 15 studies3 / 1003.0% of usable responses

How to read this. A first-place recommendation earns 10 points, second place 9, down to 1 point for tenth. An absence earns zero. We average within each platform, then across platforms and studies, and scale to 100. Each study has equal weight.

Only valid ranking responses count. Qualification requires at least two studies and three response appearances. Published names are grouped by case and punctuation; distinct name variants remain separate. A broad score can favor providers serving many hosting needs. It is not a customer rating, service guarantee, or assessment of workload compatibility.

Research dates: 2026-10-03. Read the ranking methodology →

Find a study for your hosting needs

Showing 1–15 of 15 results

Independent research · Open methodology