Independent research. A clearer hosting perspective.
HostingConsensus Index

THE RESEARCH LIBRARY

Website Builders research

Compare website builders through independent AI consensus studies. Start with your hosting situation, then explore the providers and evidence.

15published studiesUnderstand the methodology

THE CATEGORY VIEW

Which providers show up most consistently?

A broader look across the published website builders studies. Compare recommendation prominence, then find the research for your situation.

Explore individual studies
Studies included
15
Usable AI responses
105
Platforms represented
7
Entities qualifying
28
Website Builders: leading category rankings. Scores measure AI recommendation prominence across published studies.
RankProvider / published entityConsensus scoreStudy coverageAI mentions
01Wix
40.1 / 100
11 / 15 studies57 / 10554.3% of usable responses
02Squarespace
38.3 / 100
14 / 15 studies55 / 10552.4% of usable responses
03Webflow
24.7 / 100
9 / 15 studies35 / 10533.3% of usable responses
04Carrd
12.0 / 100
4 / 15 studies15 / 10514.3% of usable responses
05Shopify
11.5 / 100
5 / 15 studies17 / 10516.2% of usable responses
06Duda
10.9 / 100
4 / 15 studies17 / 10516.2% of usable responses
07Framer
10.1 / 100
6 / 15 studies17 / 10516.2% of usable responses
08Pixpa
9.8 / 100
3 / 15 studies13 / 10512.4% of usable responses
09Format
9.2 / 100
2 / 15 studies12 / 10511.4% of usable responses
10GoDaddy Website Builder
8.2 / 100
5 / 15 studies15 / 10514.3% of usable responses
See all 28 qualifying entities
Website Builders: remaining category rankings. Scores measure AI recommendation prominence across published studies.
RankProvider / published entityConsensus scoreStudy coverageAI mentions
11Hostinger Website Builder
8.0 / 100
2 / 15 studies11 / 10510.5% of usable responses
12WordPress.com
6.9 / 100
8 / 15 studies14 / 10513.3% of usable responses
13Google Sites
4.0 / 100
3 / 15 studies7 / 1056.7% of usable responses
14Big Cartel
3.6 / 100
2 / 15 studies6 / 1055.7% of usable responses
15Contentful
3.1 / 100
2 / 15 studies5 / 1054.8% of usable responses
16Weebly
3.0 / 100
4 / 15 studies7 / 1056.7% of usable responses
17Cargo
2.9 / 100
3 / 15 studies7 / 1056.7% of usable responses
18Zenfolio
2.8 / 100
2 / 15 studies6 / 1055.7% of usable responses
19Adobe Portfolio
2.7 / 100
2 / 15 studies6 / 1055.7% of usable responses
20SGEN
2.3 / 100
3 / 15 studies3 / 1052.9% of usable responses
21Looops
2.1 / 100
3 / 15 studies4 / 1053.8% of usable responses
22HubSpot Content Hub
2.1 / 100
2 / 15 studies3 / 1052.9% of usable responses
23Site123
1.9 / 100
4 / 15 studies6 / 1055.7% of usable responses
24Base44
1.9 / 100
2 / 15 studies4 / 1053.8% of usable responses
25Dorik
1.6 / 100
2 / 15 studies4 / 1053.8% of usable responses
26Hostinger
1.1 / 100
2 / 15 studies5 / 1054.8% of usable responses
27EasySite
0.9 / 100
2 / 15 studies3 / 1052.9% of usable responses
28Jimdo
0.8 / 100
3 / 15 studies3 / 1052.9% of usable responses

How to read this. A first-place recommendation earns 10 points, second place 9, down to 1 point for tenth. An absence earns zero. We average within each platform, then across platforms and studies, and scale to 100. Each study has equal weight.

Only valid ranking responses count. Qualification requires at least two studies and three response appearances. Published names are grouped by case and punctuation; distinct name variants remain separate. A broad score can favor providers serving many hosting needs. It is not a customer rating, service guarantee, or assessment of workload compatibility.

Research dates: 2026-10-03. Read the ranking methodology →

Find a study for your hosting needs

Showing 1–15 of 15 results

Independent research · Open methodology