PhoenixNAP Review for Large-Scale Backup and Archival Storage Infrastructure

The research in brief

PhoenixNAP is a good fit for dedicated servers for bulk backup storage when the buyer wants self-managed hardware with high-capacity HDD storage, strong U.S. network connectivity, and flexible hourly or multi-year billing. Four of the seven platforms in this study named PhoenixNAP during the ranking stage, with an average listed rank of 4.25 and a best rank of 1. The strongest reason to consider it is the published Dedicated Storage Server line, which advertises a 2 x 1 TB NVMe plus 6 x 10 TB HDD configuration from $562 per month ^[24]. The main limitation is that PhoenixNAP does not publicly document a general data-durability guarantee, default RAID layout, or hot-spare policy for that storage server, so redundancy must be confirmed in writing before purchase ^[14].

Research Snapshot

Why PhoenixNAP Qualified for This Study

Questions explored

• Is PhoenixNAP a good choice for dedicated servers for bulk backup storage?
• Which platforms recommended PhoenixNAP for large-scale backup and archival storage?

PhoenixNAP qualified because four of the seven platforms named it during ranking discovery, and every platform that evaluated it for this use case returned a usable fit assessment. The platform-level fit ratings were good from ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Grok; mixed from DeepSeek and Perplexity; and uncertain from Kimi. No platform rated PhoenixNAP as a poor fit.

The entity's ranking profile is moderate rather than dominant. It appeared at rank 1 on ChatGPT, rank 4 on DeepSeek, rank 5 on Gemini, and rank 7 on Perplexity, producing an average listed rank of 4.25. That spread matters for buyers: PhoenixNAP is consistently recognized as a legitimate candidate for storage-heavy dedicated hardware, but it is not the unanimous first choice among the platforms studied.

PhoenixNAP's qualification rests on a specific, published product rather than general brand recognition. The Dedicated Storage Server line is explicitly marketed for backup and archival data, and the Bare Metal Cloud catalog includes storage-oriented instance families ^[24]. The company also operates U.S. data centers in Phoenix and Ashburn, which supports domestic backup residency requirements ^[7].

The hosting offering in focus

Questions explored

• Which PhoenixNAP plan is the best match for a buyer who needs roughly 60 TB of raw HDD capacity for backup storage?
• How does the PhoenixNAP d3.s5.xlarge compare to the Dedicated Storage Server for bulk archival data?
• Is PhoenixNAP Network File Storage a better option than a dedicated storage server for long-term backup retention?

The most relevant offer is the PhoenixNAP Dedicated Storage Server, specifically the configuration advertised with 2 x 1 TB NVMe plus 6 x 10 TB HDD, 10 Gbps public and private networking, 15 TB of bandwidth, and 20 Gbps DDoS protection at a $562 per month starting price ^[24]. A lower-capacity variant with 2 x 1 TB NVMe plus 6 x 4 TB HDD is advertised from $392 per month, and a high-IOPS variant with 2 x 1 TB NVMe plus 6 x 1.9 TB SSD is advertised from $983 per month ^[24].

The second relevant option is the Bare Metal Cloud d3.s5.xlarge instance, described in platform responses as dual Xeon Gold 6430, 256 GB DDR5, 6 x 15.36 TB NVMe plus a 1 TB boot drive, and dual 25 Gbps networking. Google reported a list price of $1,921.61 per month or $3.10 per hour, falling as low as $950.84 per month with commitment ^[10]. Anthropic reported the same $3.10 hourly rate but calculated roughly $2,232 per month, and Grok reported $950.84 or more per month reserved ^[7]. These monthly figures conflict and should be treated as platform-reported rather than settled.

The third relevant option is Bare Metal Cloud Network File Storage, documented for Phoenix and Ashburn only, which attaches to Bare Metal Cloud servers in the same location and supports backup and archival use cases ^[21]. Published rates were reported at $0.12 per TB-hour, or approximately $86.40 per TB-month at hourly pricing, with lower rates for 12-, 24-, or 36-month reservations ^[21]. This is network storage, not dedicated local disk, and it is not the lowest-cost path for long-term bulk retention.

What the AI Platforms Agreed About

Questions explored

• What do AI platforms agree is PhoenixNAP's biggest strength for bulk backup storage?
• Do the platforms agree that PhoenixNAP publishes usable pricing for storage servers?

The platforms agreed on three points. First, PhoenixNAP's HDD-based Dedicated Storage Server is the correct product for bulk backup capacity, not the NVMe-heavy d3.s5.xlarge. OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, and Gemini all identified the 6 x 10 TB HDD configuration as the closest match to a cost-efficient archival node, while describing the NVMe instance as performance-oriented ^[24].

Second, the platforms agreed that PhoenixNAP publishes at least some usable pricing. The $562 per month figure for the 6 x 10 TB HDD storage server appears in ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Gemini responses ^[24]. Google rated its pricing confidence high; ChatGPT, Claude, Grok, and Perplexity rated theirs moderate; DeepSeek and Kimi rated theirs low ^[10].

Third, the platforms agreed that PhoenixNAP's network and bandwidth position is a genuine advantage. Bare Metal Cloud includes 15 TB of free bandwidth for the first deployment at a location, inbound traffic is free, and additional bandwidth is available pay-per-use or through reserved packages ^[9]. OpenAI documented bandwidth packages ranging from 30 TB to 3,000 TB ^[12].

Agreement among platforms does not establish product quality. It reflects that the same company-owned pages were retrievable by multiple models.

Where the AI Platforms Disagreed or Were Uncertain

Questions explored

• Why do AI platforms disagree about whether PhoenixNAP is a good fit for archival backup storage?
• Is the PhoenixNAP d3.s5.xlarge configuration actually available and priced as described?

The platforms disagreed on overall fit. OpenAI, Claude, Gemini, and Grok rated PhoenixNAP a good fit. Deepseek and Perplexity rated it mixed. Kimi rated it uncertain. The disagreement tracks one variable: whether the buyer needs a documented durability guarantee. Platforms that weighted published pricing and network capability rated PhoenixNAP favorably; platforms that weighted durability SLAs and cold-archive tiering rated it lower ^[14].

The platforms were uncertain about the d3.s5.xlarge. OpenAI stated the exact configuration supplied for evaluation was not found on the publicly accessible pages checked ^[2]. Perplexity noted that the checked public Dedicated Storage Servers result showed Xeon Gold 6258R-based configurations rather than the Xeon Gold 6430 hardware described in the prompt ^[24]. Google and Claude both reported the d3.s5.xlarge as a listed Bare Metal Cloud instance with published pricing ^[10]. This is a direct conflict about whether the SKU is currently orderable as described.

The platforms also disagreed on monthly cost for the same instance. Google reported $1,921.61 per month list and $950.84 per month with commitment ^[10]. Anthropic reported approximately $2,232 per month ^[7]. Grok reported $950.84 or more per month reserved ^[7]. Buyers should treat all three as unverified until confirmed in the portal or a written quote.

Features for this workload

Questions explored

• Does PhoenixNAP document RAID levels, hot spares, and usable capacity for its 6 x 10 TB HDD storage server?
• What bulk data transfer and bandwidth options does PhoenixNAP offer for large backup ingestion?

Capacity per dollar is the clearest documented advantage. Anthropic calculated the 6 x 10 TB HDD configuration at approximately $9.37 per TB per month based on the $562 monthly price, and calculated the d3.s5.xlarge at approximately $24.23 per TB per month on an annual basis ^[24]. Those figures are platform calculations from company-published prices, not independent benchmarks, and usable capacity after RAID parity is not published.

Drive redundancy is the weakest documented area. Anthropic found that a software RAID 1 option is available for primary hard drives on Dedicated Servers and requires two identical SATA HDDs ^[18]. However, ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and DeepSeek all reported that the reviewed public pages do not specify a default RAID level, hot-spare policy, rebuild guarantee, or usable capacity for the advertised six-drive storage server configurations ^[14]. Kimi reported that PhoenixNAP states all servers come with RAID for data protection but does not specify levels for these configurations ^[7].

Data durability is not publicly guaranteed for dedicated local storage. OpenAI, Claude, DeepSeek, Perplexity, and Kimi each reported that no general data-durability SLA or durability percentage was found for dedicated server storage or Network File Storage ^[21]. Anthropic noted that SourceForge describes a 100% uptime guarantee and SLA-backed network uptime, but that this covers availability rather than data durability ^[33]. PhoenixNAP separately documents S3-compatible object storage with Object Lock, Veeam compatibility, and erasure coding, which is the more appropriate service for immutable retention ^[3].

Bulk data transfer is well supported. Bare Metal Cloud includes 15 TB of free bandwidth for the first deployment at a location, with inbound traffic free and additional bandwidth available pay-per-use or reserved ^[9]. Google reported outbound overage starting at $0.01 per GB in U.S. and EU locations and $0.03 per GB in Singapore ^[32]. OpenAI documented bandwidth packages from 30 TB to 3,000 TB with monthly and multi-year reservation options ^[12]. No platform found a physical seeding or bulk-import service comparable to a data-shipping appliance; Kimi and Claude both flagged this as a gap ^[7].

Provisioning and automation are documented. Bare Metal Cloud supports API, CLI, and portal deployment, hourly consumption, and 1-, 12-, 24-, or 36-month reservations ^[2]. Anthropic reported deployment in under 120 seconds via API or CLI and integration with Terraform, Ansible, and Pulumi ^[34]. Google reported deployment in under 60 seconds with up to 50 Gbps networking on high-end instances ^[7].

Pricing, renewal terms, and ongoing costs

Questions explored

• How much does PhoenixNAP charge per month for a 6 x 10 TB HDD dedicated storage server, and what does that work out to per terabyte?
• What are PhoenixNAP's bandwidth overage fees and reservation cancellation terms for backup storage?

Published starting prices for the storage server line are $392 per month for 2 x 1 TB NVMe plus 6 x 4 TB HDD, $562 per month for 2 x 1 TB NVMe plus 6 x 10 TB HDD, and $983 per month for a high-IOPS 2 x 2 TB NVMe plus 6 x 1.9 TB SSD configuration ^[24]. These are described as starting prices, so final cost may vary by location, availability, term, bandwidth, IPs, operating system, and customization ^[24].

Bare Metal Cloud billing is hourly with monthly and yearly reservations. OpenAI and Perplexity both reported hourly billing and 1-, 12-, 24-, and 36-month reservation options ^[2]. Google reported that commitments of 12, 24, or 36 months lock in substantial discounts but require contract persistence ^[10]. Grok reported reservations saving up to 30% ^[7].

Network File Storage publishes hourly and 1-, 12-, 24-, and 36-month reservation prices by capacity tier, with longer commitments receiving lower published rates ^[21]. OpenAI reported published rates of $0.12 per TB-hour, or approximately $86.40 per TB-month at hourly pricing ^[21].

Additional fees identified across platform responses include outbound bandwidth beyond included or reserved allowances, public IP allocation charges including charges for allocated IPs even when unassigned, operating-system and software costs, and taxes or quote-specific setup charges ^[9]. Google reported that public IP allocations are billed in hourly blocks depending on block size ^[32]. The official IP and bandwidth pricing page retrieved for this study displayed bandwidth bundle tables with blank or dynamically populated values, so exact additional-transfer costs require portal or sales confirmation (official:C3).

Contract and cancellation terms are not fully documented. OpenAI reported that specific cancellation, early-termination, refund, and renewal terms were not verified from reviewed public pages ^[2]. Anthropic reported no refund policy stated as of 2026 research and no explicit cancellation penalty or lock-in period documented ^[24]. Deepseek reported that month-to-month and longer-term contracts are commonly offered but specific terms were not verified ^[14]. Perplexity reported that early termination, cancellation, renewal, and data egress terms for the specific storage server SKU were not verified ^[24].

Best Suited For

Questions explored

• Who gets the most value from PhoenixNAP dedicated storage servers for bulk backup storage?
• Is PhoenixNAP a good fit for a U.S. IT team that wants to manage its own RAID and backup software?

PhoenixNAP is best suited to IT teams that want dedicated, self-managed backup hardware with roughly tens of terabytes of local HDD capacity per server and substantial transfer capability. OpenAI described the fit as good for teams seeking dedicated, self-managed backup hardware with roughly tens of terabytes of local HDD capacity and substantial transfer capability ^[24].

Specific buyer profiles supported by the platform responses include mid-market IT teams needing cost-efficient dedicated hardware for bulk backup storage outside primary infrastructure, organizations requiring 60 TB or more of raw capacity on single servers with mixed IOPS and capacity requirements, and teams able to manage RAID, backup software, monitoring, replication, and recovery testing themselves ^[24].

The fit is strongest for buyers deploying in U.S. locations. Bare Metal Cloud is publicly listed in multiple U.S. locations including Phoenix, Ashburn, Chicago, and Seattle, and Network File Storage is specifically documented for Phoenix and Ashburn ^[2]. Buyers who need API-driven provisioning, Infrastructure-as-Code integration, and hourly billing flexibility are also well matched ^[34].

Buyers who want a tiered architecture rather than all-local storage are also a fit. PhoenixNAP offers separate Network File Storage and S3-compatible object storage options, allowing a tiered design instead of forcing all data onto local server disks ^[21].

Probably Not Best Suited For

Questions explored

• Who should not choose PhoenixNAP for dedicated servers for bulk backup storage?
• Is PhoenixNAP suitable as a sole immutable archival copy for compliance-driven retention?

PhoenixNAP is probably not the best fit for buyers who need a sole, immutable, provider-guaranteed archival copy. OpenAI, Claude, DeepSeek, and Perplexity each identified this as a poor match, citing the absence of a published data-durability guarantee and the lack of immutable backup capability on dedicated storage servers ^[21].

It is also a weak fit for buyers who require built-in multi-site durability or object-lock retention without deploying a separate storage service. Anthropic listed organizations requiring guaranteed five-nines data durability for archival compliance and single-site environments requiring hardware-level RAID redundancy guarantees on HDD storage as poor fits ^[7].

Buyers unwilling to manage drive redundancy, spare capacity, repair procedures, and off-site replication should look elsewhere. OpenAI listed this explicitly as a poor fit ^[24]. Deepseek similarly flagged teams wanting tape, cold-archive, or cloud-tier backup services rather than dedicated bare metal ^[14].

Buyers optimizing strictly on the lowest cost per retained terabyte are also a weaker match. Deepseek, Perplexity, and Kimi all noted that object storage or high-density HDD-only architectures typically win on pure archival economics, and Kimi specifically flagged that PhoenixNAP's value proposition is unverified against competitors publishing $1 to $2 per TB per month HDD pricing ^[14].

When Another Option May Be Better

Questions explored

• What is a better alternative to PhoenixNAP for a buyer who needs a published data durability guarantee?
• When should a buyer choose object storage or a cold-archive tier instead of a PhoenixNAP dedicated storage server?

Another option may be better in four situations. First, when the buyer requires a certified high-durability SLA for long-term compliance archival, Claude recommended considering AWS S3, Azure Blob, or Google Cloud Storage guarantees ^[7]. Second, when multi-region backup infrastructure with consistent redundancy across geographies is required, Claude noted that AWS, Azure, or multi-cloud providers offer broader geographic options ^[7].

Third, when cold-archive tier pricing is critical for infrequently accessed, long-retention data, Claude recommended Glacier, Archive Blob, or Backblaze B2 tiered cold storage pricing ^[7]. Fourth, when the buyer needs bulk data import for initial backup seeding, Claude recommended AWS Snowball, Azure Data Box, or Google Transfer Appliance, since no equivalent PhoenixNAP service was found ^[31].

Kimi named specific competing providers with published per-TB pricing: CoreNetHub at 192 TB raw for $199 per month with RAID 6 default and 10 Gbps unmetered, HostForY at $300 per month for 72 TB with ZFS default and no egress fees, OVHcloud with 500 GB to 10 TB backup space and unlimited ingress and egress in the US and EU, and EqServers with 100 TB to 500 TB and unmetered plans ^[1]. These are competitor-published claims, not independently verified comparisons.

Buyers who need a managed backup service with the hardware transparent to them should consider S3-compatible object storage providers, per Claude's assessment ^[7]. Buyers who need custom HDD redundancy strategy such as RAID 6 or erasure coding in a single chassis may prefer traditional NAS appliance vendors ^[7].

Questions to ask before choosing a provider

Questions explored

• What should a buyer confirm with PhoenixNAP about RAID, hot spares, and usable capacity before signing?
• What bandwidth, egress, and cancellation terms should a buyer get in writing from PhoenixNAP?

The platform responses converged on a consistent verification list. Buyers should confirm the exact RAID level, filesystem recommendation, usable capacity, hot-spare policy, and rebuild behavior for the six-drive configuration, since none of these are published ^[14].

Buyers should confirm whether the advertised drives are enterprise-grade and what the drive warranty, replacement SLA, and maintenance procedures are ^[14]. They should also confirm whether local storage is replicated, backed up, snapshotted, or otherwise protected by PhoenixNAP, or whether all redundancy is the buyer's responsibility ^[21].

Buyers should confirm current outbound bandwidth prices, package sizes, overage rates, and reservation cancellation rules, since the retrieved official bandwidth pricing page displayed blank or dynamically populated values (official:C3, Evidence ID openai:c7). They should confirm whether inbound backup transfers are free under the selected product and whether restores or inter-region transfers are charged ^[9].

Buyers should confirm whether the server can be deployed with their preferred RAID controller, encryption, immutable backup repository, or backup software ^[14]. They should confirm reservation renewal, early-termination, suspension, and cancellation terms, which were not verified from public pages ^[2].

Finally, buyers should confirm whether the exact d3.s5.xlarge configuration is currently available in Phoenix or Ashburn and what its exact hourly, monthly, and 12-, 24-, and 36-month reservation price is, given the conflicting platform reports ^[2].

The consensus assessment

PhoenixNAP is a good fit for dedicated servers for bulk backup storage, with material verification gaps that buyers must close before committing. Four of seven platforms named it during ranking, with an average listed rank of 4.25 and a best rank of 1. Four platforms rated the fit good, two rated it mixed, and one rated it uncertain.

The strongest documented case rests on the Dedicated Storage Server line: a published 2 x 1 TB NVMe plus 6 x 10 TB HDD configuration from $562 per month, 10 Gbps networking, 15 TB of included bandwidth, and 20 Gbps DDoS protection ^[24]. The weakest documented area is durability and redundancy: no general data-durability SLA, no published default RAID level, no hot-spare policy, and no usable-capacity figure for the six-drive configuration ^[14].

PhoenixNAP becomes a stronger architecture when paired with immutable S3-compatible object storage or a second geographic copy ^[3]. It should not be treated as a complete archival-durability solution without written confirmation of RAID, hardware replacement, durability, bandwidth, and retention terms.

How This Review Was Produced

This review was produced from seven platform responses collected for the research date 2026-10-03, using the research prompt asking which providers would be recommended for storing large volumes of backup and archival data on dedicated hardware. Each platform returned a fit assessment, use-case findings, pricing and terms, limitations, and questions to verify before buying.

Platform mentions in the ranking stage count only platforms that named PhoenixNAP during ranking discovery. All seven platforms evaluated fit, but only four named the entity during ranking. Fit ratings were good from ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Grok; mixed from DeepSeek and Perplexity; and uncertain from Kimi.

Citations are platform-reported evidence, not independently verified facts. Company-owned citations materially outnumber independent citations in this study, so company claims should not be described as independently verified. The supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage.

Research limitations

Several limitations apply. Platform-reported research dates differ from the authoritative run date: DeepSeek reported 2026-02-02 while the remaining platforms reported 2026-10-03. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

Deepseek's response was produced with search disabled, so its findings rely on model knowledge rather than retrieved pages. Its pricing confidence was rated low, and its claims about PhoenixNAP pricing should be treated as requiring verification before being described as current facts.

The exact d3.s5.xlarge configuration and price were not consistently confirmed across platforms. Google and Claude reported published pricing; ChatGPT and Perplexity reported that the configuration could not be confirmed on the pages they checked. This conflict is unresolved in the supplied evidence.

No platform found a published general data-durability SLA for dedicated local storage or Network File Storage. Missing research is not evidence of absence, but buyers should not assume a durability guarantee exists.

The retrieved official bandwidth pricing page displayed blank or dynamically populated values in the bandwidth bundle tables, so exact additional-transfer costs could not be confirmed from that source.

This review evaluates PhoenixNAP only for dedicated servers for bulk backup storage. It is not a broad company review, and findings should not be extended to other PhoenixNAP product lines or use cases.

See the broader Large-Scale Backup and Archival Storage Infrastructure consensus index for comparisons across qualified options.

Explore more vps cloud and dedicated server hosting guidance in the category directory.

Sources

Company-Owned Sources

1. Bulk Storage Servers up to 192 TB | CoreNetHub: https://corenethub.com/storage-servers/bulk-storage/
2. Bare Metal Cloud Servers | On-Demand Dedicated Infrastructure: https://docs.phoenixnap.com/bare-metal-cloud
3. Cloud Object Storage with Bare Metal Cloud: https://docs.phoenixnap.com/object-storage
4. Storage servers · ZFS, ECC, up to 375 TB · zero egress · Hostfory: https://hostfory.com/storage/
5. Dedicated Backup Servers | Ransomware Protection & Speedy RTO: https://novoserve.com/dedicated-server-backup
6. Backup and Restore Solutions: https://phoenixnap.com/backup-restore
7. Bare Metal Cloud Servers: https://phoenixnap.com/bare-metal-cloud
8. Bare Metal Cloud Pricing - phoenixNAP: https://phoenixnap.com/bare-metal-cloud/instances
9. Flexible IP and Bandwidth Pricing: https://phoenixnap.com/bare-metal-cloud/ip-pricing
10. Bare Metal Cloud Pricing: https://phoenixnap.com/bare-metal-cloud/pricing
11. Bare Metal Cloud Ecosystem: https://phoenixnap.com/bare-metal-cloud/technology-ecosystem
12. Reduce Data Transfer Costs with Bare Metal Cloud Bandwidth Packages: https://phoenixnap.com/blog/bare-metal-cloud-bandwidth-packages
13. Cloud Pricing Calculator: https://phoenixnap.com/cloud-pricing-calculator
14. Dedicated Servers | Premium Dedicated Server Hosting: https://phoenixnap.com/dedicated-servers
15. Dedicated Storage Server Hosting | High Capacity Storage: https://phoenixnap.com/dedicated-servers/storage-servers
16. High Availability Solutions - phoenixNAP: https://phoenixnap.com/infrastructure-solutions/high-availability-solutions
17. Bare Metal Cloud Storage Management via Portal and API: https://phoenixnap.com/kb/bare-metal-cloud-storage
18. Dedicated Servers Portal Guide: https://phoenixnap.com/kb/dedicated-servers-portal-guide
19. What is Bare Metal Cloud?: https://phoenixnap.com/kb/what-is-bare-metal-cloud
20. PhoenixNAP Service Level Agreement: https://phoenixnap.com/legal/sla
21. Network File Storage | phoenixNAP Bare Metal Cloud: https://phoenixnap.com/network-file-storage
22. Cloud Object Storage with Bare Metal Cloud: https://phoenixnap.com/object-storage
23. Cloud Object Storage with Bare Metal Cloud: https://phoenixnap.com/object-storage-service
24. Dedicated Storage Server Hosting | High Capacity Storage by phoenixNAP: https://phoenixnap.com/servers/storage
25. Armazenamento Dedicado Server Hospedagem: https://phoenixnap.pt/servers/storage
26. High-Storage Dedicated Servers for Backup & Archive | EqServers: https://www.eqservers.com/storage-servers.php
27. Storage Dedicated Servers - NAS & Bulk Storage | Host & Tech: https://www.hostandtech.com/storage-dedicated-server/
28. Backup & Storage Dedicated Servers | Start Your BaaS Business | iRexta: https://www.irexta.com/backup-storage-servers/
29. Storage Dedicated Servers | OVHcloud Worldwide: https://www.ovhcloud.com/en/bare-metal/storage/
30. Veeam Dedicated Cloud Repositories | Pricing Options: https://www.sddatacenter.com/solutions/veeam-dedicated-cloud-repositories/

Independent Sources

31. PhoenixNAP Bare Metal - Data Storage: https://datastorage.com/cloud_providers/phoenixnap-bare-metal/
32. PhoenixNAP Bare Metal - Data Storage: https://datastorage.com/phoenixnap-bare-metal/
33. phoenixNAP Reviews in 2026: https://sourceforge.net/software/product/phoenixNAP/
34. PhoenixNAP Bare metal Cloud Pricing 2026: https://www.g2.com/products/phoenixnap-bare-metal-cloud/pricing
35. phoenixNAP Enables Out-of-the-Box Network Storage Implementations in Bare Metal Cloud: https://www.prweb.com/releases/phoenixnap-enables-out-of-the-box-network-storage-implementations-in-bare-metal-cloud-845147689.html