Fly.io Review for SaaS Startups Needing Pay-As-You-Grow Infrastructure

The research in brief

Fly.io is a good fit for elastic cloud hosting for SaaS startups, with caveats. Four of seven platforms named Fly.io during the ranking stage, and all seven evaluated it for fit. The strongest reason to consider it is genuine per-second compute billing on fast-booting Fly Machines, combined with scale-to-zero behavior and multi-region deployment ^[34]. The main limitation is cost predictability: compute, volumes, snapshots, IP addresses, and region-tiered egress each meter separately, and the free allowance for new accounts was removed in 2024 ^[43]. Fit ratings ranged from "mixed" to "strong" across platforms.

Research Snapshot

Why Fly.io Qualified for This Study

Questions explored

• Why did Fly.io qualify for this SaaS startup cloud hosting study?
• How many AI platforms named Fly.io for elastic cloud hosting for SaaS startups?

Fly.io qualified because four of the seven included platforms named it during ranking discovery, and all seven platforms returned a fit assessment for the elastic SaaS hosting use case. The platforms that named it were Claude, DeepSeek, Gemini, and Grok. Its listed ranks ranged from 1 (Grok) to 6 (DeepSeek), producing an average listed rank of 3.25.

The study's category criteria were usage-based billing flexibility, ease of scaling up or down, developer tooling and integrations, global availability zones, and startup credits or programs. Fly.io was evaluated against all five. It drew advantage assessments on billing flexibility, elasticity, developer tooling, and global availability, and limitation or unclear assessments on startup credits and managed database operations ^[34].

This is a niche fit review, not a broad company review. It evaluates Fly.io only for elastic cloud hosting for SaaS startups. For the full field of providers assessed against this use case, see the elastic cloud hosting for SaaS startups consensus index.

The hosting offering in focus

Questions explored

• Which Fly.io product should a SaaS startup use for elastic, pay-as-you-grow hosting?
• Is Fly Machines pay-as-you-go suitable for a SaaS product with uncertain traffic?

The relevant offering is Fly Machines on a pay-as-you-go basis, optionally paired with Managed Postgres. Fly Machines run containerized applications as lightweight Firecracker-based microVMs with sub-second startup times and per-second billing while running ^[31].

Platforms described the plan slightly differently. OpenAI and Perplexity both pointed to Fly Machines with per-second billing and optional Managed Postgres. Google named Fly Machines plus Managed Postgres. Grok and Kimi named Fly Machines (Pay-As-You-Go) alone. Deepseek listed several variants, including Machines with scale-to-zero and Machines with Postgres for SaaS workloads. These are naming variations on the same core product rather than conflicting products.

Two operational details matter for a SaaS buyer. First, stopped Machines are not billed for CPU or RAM but do incur root filesystem storage charges at $0.15 per GB per month ^[15]. Second, autostop/autostart is not the same as unlimited autoscaling: Fly Proxy can stop and restart Machines that already exist, but it does not create new Machines on its own ^[26].

What the AI Platforms Agreed About

Questions explored

• What do AI platforms agree on about Fly.io for SaaS startups with variable traffic?
• Is Fly.io's per-second billing genuinely useful for pay-as-you-grow SaaS hosting?

Agreement was strong on four points.

Usage-based billing is real and granular. Every platform that addressed pricing described per-second billing for running Machines, with storage and network priced separately ^[34]. Fly's own pricing page shows shared-cpu-1x 256MB at $0.0030 per hour, or $2.19 per month at 730 hours (official:C2).

Elasticity is a core design goal. Platforms consistently described Fly Machines as fast-booting microVMs suited to variable workloads, with scale-to-zero available through configuration ^[38].

Global placement is native. Fly routes traffic through Anycast and supports deployment across many regions without requiring buyers to build their own overlay network ^[28]. Region counts reported by platforms ranged from 18 to 35+, which is a discrepancy addressed below.

Developer tooling is CLI- and container-first. Platforms agreed that Docker-based deployment, the flyctl CLI, and API access suit engineering-led teams ^[12].

Agreement among AI platforms does not establish product quality. It reflects what these systems surfaced from the sources they retrieved.

Where the AI Platforms Disagreed or Were Uncertain

Questions explored

• Do AI platforms disagree about Fly.io's startup credits and free tier for new SaaS startups?
• How many regions does Fly.io actually operate, and why do sources disagree?

Several material conflicts surfaced.

Startup credits. Fly's own pricing page advertises up to $15,000 in credit for eligible early-stage companies (Evidence ID anthropic:10-8, official:C2, Evidence ID grok:web:17). But Kimi reported that Fly.io does not operate a traditional credit program gated on accelerators or venture funds ^[30], and ChatGPT found no standardized, publicly documented startup-credit amount or eligibility policy ^[30]. Perplexity also could not verify an active program ^[34]. The most defensible reading: a program is advertised, but eligibility rules, approval rates, and typical award sizes are not publicly detailed.

Region count. Reported figures include 18 regions ^[46], 34 regions ^[57], and 35+ regions ^[53]. Fly's own region-consolidation notice confirms regions can be deprecated or consolidated, so older region guides may be stale ^[11]. Buyers should validate current region inventory directly.

Scale-to-zero. Some community and older documentation suggested scale-to-zero was unavailable or API-only ^[3], while 2026 documentation and independent guides describe an auto_stop_machines flag with min_machines = 0 ^[41]. Fly's own autoscaler documentation states the autoscaler does not scale to zero and always keeps at least one Machine running ^[18]. These are not fully reconciled in the supplied evidence.

Managed versus unmanaged Postgres. Fly documents Managed Postgres as a fully managed service with backups, failover, and encryption ^[32]. Deepseek cited Fly Postgres documentation describing it as unmanaged, with users responsible for backups, HA, and failover ^[22]. Fly's own "This Is Not Managed Postgres" page confirms unmanaged Fly Postgres requires the customer to run version and security upgrades ^[23]. These describe two different products, and buyers must confirm which one they are pricing.

Fit ratings. Anthropic rated Fly.io "mixed." OpenAI, DeepSeek, and Perplexity rated it "good." Google, Grok, and Kimi rated it "strong."

Features for this workload

Questions explored

• Does Fly.io support automatic scale-to-zero for SaaS workloads without custom code?
• Can Fly.io run a SaaS application across multiple global regions with a managed database?

Billing and elasticity. Compute is billed by the second while a Machine runs ^[34]. Stopped Machines incur rootfs storage at $0.15 per GB per month (official:C2). Fly Proxy can automatically stop or suspend excess Machines and restart stopped ones when traffic requires capacity, but it only operates on Machines already created ^[26]. The metrics-based autoscaler clones existing Machines and does not scale to zero ^[18]. Independent guidance describes setting auto_stop_machines = true and min_machines = 0, with a default idle window of about five minutes before a Machine stops ^[41].

Developer tooling. Fly Machines run containerized applications as Firecracker microVMs with CLI-driven deployment, private networking, health checks, and configuration-based service exposure ^[31]. Fly's startup comparison page describes fly launch auto-detecting frameworks such as Rails, Django, Laravel, and Phoenix ^[30]. Platforms described the platform as more infrastructure-oriented than a fully managed PaaS ^[31].

Global availability. Fly routes requests to nearby Machines through Anycast and supports deployment across North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, South America, and Africa ^[28]. Most regions have a single datacenter rather than explicit availability zones ^[1]. Some regions, including sjc, gru, and bom, are documented as high-demand, and hardcoding placement there can result in provisioning failure ^[20].

Managed Postgres. Fly describes Managed Postgres as handling backups, recovery, high availability with automatic failover, performance monitoring, resource scaling, connection pooling with PgBouncer, and encryption at rest and in transit ^[32]. It is available in five regions: Chicago (ord), Singapore (sin), San Jose (sjc), Sydney (syd), and Toronto (yyz) ^[32]. Storage is billed at $0.28 per provisioned GB per 30-day month, with a 1 TB per-cluster maximum ^[21]. A global SaaS application with a single-region database will incur cross-region traffic costs and latency.

Startup credits. Fly advertises up to $15,000 in credit for eligible early-stage companies (Evidence ID anthropic:10-8, official:C2). Independent coverage describes the program as requiring direct application with terms not publicly detailed (Evidence ID anthropic:12-8, costbench.com).

Pricing, renewal terms, and ongoing costs

Questions explored

• How much does Fly.io cost per month for a small SaaS app, and what fees are easy to miss?
• Does Fly.io require a long-term contract or charge cancellation fees?

Fly.io is month-to-month with no minimum contract term identified for ordinary usage billing ^[15]. Independent coverage states there is no annual prepay discount or upfront payment path ^[47]. Fly's terms of service describe a month-long subscription term that renews monthly until terminated (official:C3).

Headline compute pricing is low. Fly's pricing page lists shared-cpu-1x 256MB at $0.0030 per hour, or $2.19 per month at 730 hours, and performance-1x 2GB at $0.0458 per hour, or $33.00 per month (official:C2). Fly's resource pricing documentation has shown shared-cpu-1x 256MB at approximately $0.0027–$0.0028 per hour with monthly equivalents around $1.94–$2.02, and Grok reported roughly $2.19 per month in the lowest regions ^[15]. These small differences reflect different pricing pages, regions, and update dates. Treat the current billing page as authoritative at purchase time.

Realistic small-app bills are higher than headline compute. Independent analysis put a real small app at $8.54–$10.56 per month once IPs, bandwidth, volumes, and certificates are counted ^[45], and another estimate placed a typical small app at $8–$25 per month ^[49]. An always-on app with storage and egress was estimated at roughly $22 per month ^[43].

Two billing lines were added in 2026: volume snapshots on January 1, 2026 at $0.08/GB-month, and inter-region private networking for Managed Postgres billed at machine rates from February 2026 ^[42]. Independent analysis estimated these additions raised typical costs 9–36% ^[42].

Fly does not currently support billing alerts, and its own cost-management documentation recommends budgeting conservatively ^[13]. Volumes bill whether or not a Machine is running, and egress IPs bill per hour whether or not traffic is sent ^[43]. Machine reservations require upfront annual payment, provide regional compute credits, and may offer a 40% compute discount, but credits do not roll over and do not cover all resource categories ^[15].

The free trial is limited to two total VM hours or seven days, with caps on Machines, volume storage, CPU, and memory ^[14]. Adding a payment method ends the trial and starts billable usage. The old free allowance of up to three shared-cpu-1x 256MB machines and 3GB of volume storage is now legacy and applies only to grandfathered accounts ^[58].

Best Suited For

Questions explored

• Which SaaS startups get the most value from Fly.io's pay-as-you-go Machines?
• Is Fly.io worth it for a containerized SaaS app with users in multiple regions?

Fly.io is best suited to containerized SaaS web applications and APIs built by teams comfortable managing application architecture through a CLI and configuration files ^[31]. It fits products that benefit from regional deployment, Anycast routing, private networking, or scale-to-zero behavior ^[28].

It also fits early workloads where per-second compute billing and low idle cost matter more than a single predictable invoice ^[34]. Teams with spiky or unpredictable traffic, and teams without accelerator-gated access to hyperscaler credits, were both named as good candidates ^[19].

For a broader view of how other providers handle this same buyer profile, the vps cloud and dedicated server hosting directory lists the wider field.

Probably Not Best Suited For

Questions explored

• Who should not choose Fly.io for elastic cloud hosting for SaaS startups?
• Is Fly.io a bad fit for a bootstrapped SaaS team that needs predictable monthly costs?

Fly.io is probably not the best fit for early-stage MVPs on a tight monthly budget without venture funding or startup credits. It is also weaker for startups serving primarily from a single region, where multi-region capability adds cost and complexity without benefit.

Teams seeking flat-rate or all-inclusive billing should look elsewhere. Independent analysis describes Fly's pricing as requiring a spreadsheet, because Machines, volumes, snapshots, IPs, and three tiers of regional egress each meter separately ^[44]. Applications with always-on single-instance requirements where cost predictability is critical are a weaker match.

Projects requiring true automatic scale-to-zero without manual configuration are also a weaker fit, since the metrics-based autoscaler does not scale to zero and always keeps at least one Machine running ^[18]. Teams that need a broad managed-service catalog, formal enterprise assurances, or verified startup credits should weigh hyperscalers instead.

When Another Option May Be Better

Questions explored

• What is a better alternative to Fly.io for a SaaS startup that needs a fully managed database?
• When should a SaaS startup choose a hyperscaler or simpler PaaS instead of Fly.io?

Choose AWS, Google Cloud, or Microsoft Azure when startup credits, broad managed-service coverage, formal enterprise procurement, or a large compliance and integration ecosystem are primary requirements. Hyperscaler startup programs were described as offering $10K–$100K in credits with accelerator or VC access.

Choose Render, Railway, or Heroku when the team values a conventional managed PaaS workflow and is willing to trade some infrastructure control or global placement flexibility. Render and Railway were described as offering simpler flat-rate plans and more predictable costs for single-region SaaS.

Choose a managed database provider alongside Fly.io when database durability, backups, failover, and operational responsibility should be separated from application hosting. Fly's Managed Postgres is limited to five regions, so a globally distributed application may need an external database ^[32].

Choose Google Cloud Run or AWS Lambda when true automatic scale-to-zero is required without custom configuration. Choose Hetzner or DigitalOcean when a budget-constrained MVP needs $5–$10 per month fixed-cost hosting with minimal global requirements.

Questions to ask before choosing a provider

Questions explored

• What should a SaaS buyer confirm with Fly.io before committing to production hosting?
• Which Fly.io costs and limits are not publicly documented well enough to plan around?

Confirm which Fly regions currently support the required Machine sizes, attached Volumes, and Managed Postgres plan. Confirm current Managed Postgres prices, backup retention, failover behavior, recovery objectives, and support boundaries, since plan-level prices and operational guarantees were not established from the reviewed sources.

Confirm whether any startup credits are currently available to a US startup, and what eligibility, expiration, and payment requirements apply. The advertised maximum is $15,000, but approval rates, typical awards, and disqualifying factors are not publicly detailed.

Confirm exact autostart latency, concurrency limits, scaling limits, and behavior during regional capacity shortages. Confirm whether the workload requires Machines to remain always on, or whether scale-to-zero startup latency is acceptable.

Confirm current public-egress and cross-region transfer rates for the selected billing configuration, and how Volumes are backed up, replicated, restored, and migrated between regions. Confirm what happens to applications, Volumes, databases, IP addresses, and retained data after payment failure or account cancellation.

Confirm support response times, service levels, capacity commitments, and escalation paths for the selected tier, and which compliance reports, data-processing terms, security controls, and subprocessors are available for the intended SaaS data. Standard support carries a 36-hour first response time, and 99.9% uptime SLAs were described as restricted to Enterprise plans starting at $2,500 per month (Evidence ID google:kuberns-reliability, official:C2).

The consensus assessment

Fly.io is a good fit overall for elastic cloud hosting for SaaS startups, with meaningful caveats. Four of seven platforms named it during ranking, and all seven assessed fit. Ratings split between "mixed" (Claude), "good" (ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Perplexity), and "strong" (Gemini, Grok, Kimi).

The strongest case for Fly.io is technical: per-second billing on fast-booting microVMs, scale-to-zero configuration, Anycast routing across many regions, and CLI-driven container deployment ^[34]. The strongest case against it is cost predictability and operational burden: multi-line metering, volumes that bill while stopped, no billing alerts, a five-region Managed Postgres footprint, and a startup credit program whose terms are advertised but not publicly detailed (Evidence ID anthropic:14-7, Evidence ID anthropic:4-1, Evidence ID anthropic:11-5, Evidence ID anthropic:41-9, official:C2).

Buyers should treat Fly.io as a strong option for technically capable teams with variable traffic and global users, and as a weaker option for teams optimizing for a single predictable invoice.

How This Review Was Produced

This review synthesizes fit-research responses from seven AI platforms: Claude (claude-haiku-4-5-20251001), DeepSeek (deepseek-v4-flash), Gemini (gemini-3.5-flash), Grok (x-ai/grok-4.3), Kimi (moonshotai/kimi-k2.6), ChatGPT (gpt-5.6-luna), and Perplexity (perplexity/sonar). Each platform was asked which providers it would recommend for a small SaaS team needing usage-based billing, fast scaling, developer tooling, and startup credit access.

Ranking statistics reflect only platforms that named Fly.io during ranking discovery. Fit assessments reflect all platforms that returned a use-case evaluation. Citations are platform-reported evidence, not independently verified facts. Company-owned citations materially outnumber independent citations in the supplied material, so company claims should not be read as independently confirmed.

Research limitations

Platform-reported research dates differ from the authoritative run date of 2026-10-03. Deepseek reported a research date of 2026-06-11, and DeepSeek ran with search disabled, so its claims are model-reported rather than retrieved. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

The supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage. No personal testing, customer experience, or independent verification was performed for this review.

Several factual conflicts remain unresolved. Fly's public pricing pages display slightly different shared-cpu-1x prices and monthly equivalents depending on page and region. The current total region inventory is not independently verified beyond Fly's own region-consolidation publication. Managed Postgres plan-level prices and operational guarantees were not established from all reviewed sources. Claims about ease of operation and reduced DevOps overhead are primarily company claims or qualitative inferences, not independent benchmark evidence.

Community reports of mid-2025 reliability incidents involving unresponsive machines were not independently verified or disclosed by Fly.io ^[49]. Billing alert support status is documented as not yet available, with no published ship date ^[13].

See the broader SaaS Startups Needing Pay-As-You-Grow Infrastructure consensus index for comparisons across qualified options.

Sources

Company-Owned Sources

1. Availability Zones: https://community.fly.io/t/availability-zones/25466
2. Registry @ registry.fly.io, is there cost to this?: https://community.fly.io/t/registry-registry-fly-io-is-there-cost-to-this/7356
3. Rolling my own autoscaling for Fly Machines: https://community.fly.io/t/rolling-my-own-autoscaling-for-fly-machines/10911
4. scale to zero possible? - Page 2: https://community.fly.io/t/scale-to-zero-possible/464?page=2
5. Fly.io Billing · Fly Docs: https://docs.fly.io/about/billing/
6. Cost Management on Fly.io - Fly.io: https://docs.fly.io/about/cost-management
7. Fly.io Resource Pricing - Fly.io: https://docs.fly.io/about/pricing
8. Fly Postgres (Unmanaged) · Fly Docs: https://docs.fly.io/postgres/
9. Regions · Fly Docs: https://docs.fly.io/reference/regions/
10. Fly.io | Computers for agents: https://fly.io/
11. The Region Consolidation Project: https://fly.io/blog/the-region-consolidation-project/
12. Fly.io Documentation: https://fly.io/docs/
13. Cost Management on Fly.io: https://fly.io/docs/about/cost-management/
14. Fly.io Free Trial: https://fly.io/docs/about/free-trial/
15. Fly.io Resource Pricing: https://fly.io/docs/about/pricing/
16. Fly.io Support: https://fly.io/docs/about/support/
17. Fly.io and PlanetScale: https://fly.io/docs/app-guides/planetscale/
18. Autoscale based on metrics: https://fly.io/docs/launch/autoscale-by-metric/
19. Fly Machines: https://fly.io/docs/machines/
20. Machine Placement and Regional Capacity: https://fly.io/docs/machines/guides-examples/machine-placement/
21. Managed Postgres: https://fly.io/docs/mpg/
22. Managed Postgres: https://fly.io/docs/postgres/
23. This Is Not Managed Postgres: https://fly.io/docs/postgres/getting-started/what-you-should-know/
24. Scale to zero for Postgres Development projects: https://fly.io/docs/postgres/managing/scale-to-zero/
25. Autoscaling and scale to zero: https://fly.io/docs/reference/autoscaling/
26. Fly Proxy autostop/autostart: https://fly.io/docs/reference/fly-proxy-autostop-autostart/
27. Fly.io Regions: https://fly.io/docs/reference/regions/
28. Regions: https://fly.io/docs/regions
29. Compliance Documents: https://fly.io/documents
30. Best Cloud for Startups: AWS vs GCP vs Azure vs PaaS: https://fly.io/learn/what-is-the-best-cloud-for-startups/
31. Fly Machines on Fly.io: https://fly.io/machines/
32. Managed Postgres on Fly.io: https://fly.io/mpg/
33. Updated pricing, effective October 1, 2026 · Fly: https://fly.io/pricing-update/
34. Fly.io Pricing: https://fly.io/pricing/
35. Fly.io Security: https://fly.io/security/
36. Fly.io for Startups · Fly: https://fly.io/startups/
37. Fly.io for Startups Program: https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQGGgIAqsm6flmGSo4ZZhtHZV5sC9KfVlL27OldPj63cTgyjPC52W0RobpV5fuvevHW7eGb89dEkUCftV__k1uhvUEEWWoKojSbzIFKK_ss=
38. Fly Machines Page: https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQHVaZD4RFKS6Rm_hYg7DWG_z6UasBOhdWjwW_fiGDDNVIoJOMseSoI49ZFyybMpQvi3tGsTyRc9IgCrX47MwTLWElOf4kHYcd75uDrevw==
39. Pricing - Fly.io: https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQHyGf0Tpd3q2TPqbk8PQy9N0fXlyB6-HohNlYV6jZnTn7PNPnTe1RicPtYQwEl1O5-p2LmNZ_dZwSwhLkqInLHLA9Fc2quvGYxLMwDPGQ==
40. Official pricing and terms source: https://fly.io/legal/terms-of-service/

Independent Sources

41. Configure Fly.io Machines to Scale to Zero When Idle (2026: https://adhdecode.com/articles/fly-io/fly-io-scale-to-zero/
42. Fly.io Added Two Billing Lines in 2026: What Metering Creep Costs Against a Flat Hetzner Box: https://bex.co/blog/2026/08/16/flyio-2026-billing-lines-metering-creep-vs-hetzner-flat-bill
43. Fly.io Killed Its Subscription Tiers in 2024 and Kept Adding Billing Lines Through 2026: https://bex.co/blog/2026/08/16/flyio-pure-usage-pricing-always-on-app-cost
44. Fly.io's September Report Card: What a 6-to-12-Month Credit Runway Buys Before the Edge-vs-PaaS Bill Comes Due: https://bex.co/blog/2026/09/12/fly-io-september-2026-report-card-credit-runway-edge-vs-paas
45. Fly.io's Fee Layers, Itemized: The Real Bill Behind the $2.02 Machine: https://bex.co/blog/2026/09/24/fly-io-fee-layers-itemized-bill-behind-2-dollar-machine
46. Fly.io 18 Regions vs Render 5 vs Railway 4: A Multi-Region Exit Checklist: https://bex.co/blog/2026/09/25/flyio-18-regions-render-railway-multi-region-exit-checklist
47. Fly.io Pricing 2026: 5 Plans from $29–$2,500/month: https://costbench.com/software/developer-tools/flyio/
48. Is Fly.io Free? Free Trial Limits & When You'll Pay (2026: https://costbench.com/software/developer-tools/flyio/free-plan/
49. 7 Fly.io Alternatives in 2026: Real Pricing After the Free Tier Died: https://expresstech.io/7-fly-io-alternatives-in-2026-real-pricing-after-the-free-tier-died/
50. Northflank vs Fly.io: which deployment platform should you: https://northflank.com/blog/northflank-vs-flyio
51. Fly.io: Funding, Team & Investors: https://startupintros.com/orgs/fly-io
52. Fly.io Pricing & Hosting Review | productgrowth.in: https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQE0CcTk1l6W4O7h7Mi0k1ES9zOhVZeV4WoTdDJ2BrGY5EpvXoKs1m4EN6r4rZDd5ZCZlx7PM1dy0uNONivUD1T8tjvhD7yU3NXlr4AkTcU5VaIXd3pmxzw6enUqwUZ2YWuOooB0yg==
53. Fly.io vs Render: How they handle jobs, scaling, and production workloads in 2026: https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQG6wft8nClVarF8dnCy11I9DvLeec3v65zPRv_wcZTEN0nbcqHJFlcX5n0Rlbqm7SAg5BSJLQDbC7k2wHOtQguEiHmGaT7skq-TqN-c0w351vqEVhXIpfyHRqe9bQpjkeA=
54. How Much Does Fly.io Cost? Pricing Explained for 2026 - Kuberns: https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQGcIU7JoIeQFElAEWqkJ0KU-vpDnnDNLk4He_utMBIP2ixMB_AS26ULOWl9TMo_6JAWwT32cmbmfc5GhkzMTDvVHe3H_rdbO326xnsEzl58RLuRErs9YJDx0hFFV0E=
55. Fly.io pricing: Plans and cost breakdown for 2025 - Orb Billing: https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQGFTavf0dPzQB5X6W_FMbA2byWheh8B5iFxuqZTCjUYsb4tAcIIGOpZx-9KnRU1ILA3DKBmkwItR9zXeGuRwab1-4W17TyXCykWSPeoC26T0DyADJ99GGGEMe8wmQlYDg==
56. Is Fly.io Good for Production? Reliability and Risks in 2026 - Kuberns: https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQGy8wLUAGZNoqTB8rqWWJu_7Vu4dP7tafqA9AHp9G2CK8ysgmo-kOTynFF66GvHK57FOt4gRT4SfaBKJa8iGqFzMwmyW1qp7NULbkU69y5EpLuo-m6jkUl5zL2Tqs-8zcBi4xFREbKeEyPQOGpd
57. Fly.io - Deploying: https://wasp.sh/docs/deployment/deployment-methods/wasp-deploy/fly
58. Fly.io Pricing 2026: The Real Pay-As-You-Go Cost (Free Tier Is Gone: https://www.budgetforge.dev/tools/fly-io-pricing-2026-2
59. Fly.io Pricing 2026: Plans, Costs & Best Value: https://www.saascompared.com/pricing/fly-io
60. Fly.io Free Tier 2026: What's Left After the Cuts?: https://www.saaspricepulse.com/tools/flyio